We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Cookie Policy & Privacy Policy
Management of Adults in Critical Condition with COVID-19: Expert Guidelines
Guidelines for managing critically ill adults with COVID-19, developed by a panel of 36 experts from 12 countries, offer evidence-based recommendations to optimize patient care and outcomes in the intensive care setting.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of COVID-19, a pandemic that has affected more than 400,000 people and caused around 20,000 deaths as of the end of March 2020. Approximately 5% to 10% of patients require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation.
Top recommendations
Infection control and testing
For healthcare workers performing aerosol-generating procedures (e.g., endotracheal intubation, nebulized treatments, open suctioning), the use of tight- fitting respirators (N95 respirators, FFP2) is recommended instead of surgical masks, in addition to other personal protective equipment (statement of best practices).
For routine care of non-ventilated patients, or for performing non-aerosol-generating procedures in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, the use of medical face masks , rather than respirator masks, is recommended in addition to other personal protective equipment (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence).
Endotracheal aspirate specimens are preferred over bronchial lavages, bronchoalveolar lavage, and upper respiratory tract (nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal) specimens (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence).
hemodynamic support
For acute resuscitation of adults with shock, the following is suggested:
Use a conservative fluid administration strategy (weak recommendation, very low level of evidence).
Use crystalloids over colloids (strong recommendation; moderate quality of evidence). Balanced crystalloids are preferred to unbalanced crystalloids (weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence).?
For adults with shock, the following is suggested:
Use norepinephrine as a first-line vasoactive agent (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence).
Use vasopressin or epinephrine as first line if norepinephrine is absent (weak recommendation, low level of evidence).
Dopamine is not recommended if norepinephrine is not available (strong recommendation, high quality of evidence).
It is suggested to add vasopressin as a second-line agent if the target mean arterial pressure (60-65 mm Hg) cannot be achieved with norepinephrine alone (weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence).
ventilatory support
It is recommended to start supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is less than 90% (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence). Saturation should remain no higher than 96% (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence).
For hypoxemic acute respiratory failure unresponsive to conventional oxygen therapy, the use of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is suggested (weak recommendation, low level of evidence).
If HFNC is not available, NIPPV testing is suggested (weak recommendation, very low level of evidence). Close monitoring for worsening respiratory status and early intubation if worsening occurs is recommended (best practice statement).
For mechanically ventilated adults who have acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the use of low tidal volume ventilation (4-8 ml/kg target body weight) is recommended and is preferred to higher volumes (> 8 ml/kg) (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence).
It is recommended to aim for plateau pressures of <30 cm H2O (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence). It is suggested to use a higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategy than a lower PEEP strategy (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence).
For mechanically ventilated adults who have moderate to severe ARDS , prone ventilation for 12 to 16 hours is suggested instead of supine ventilation (weak recommendation, low level of evidence).
The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMB) as needed instead of continuous NMB infusion is recommended to facilitate protective lung ventilation (weak recommendation, low level of evidence).
For mechanically ventilated adults who have severe ARDS and hypoxemia despite optimizing ventilation, a trial of inhaled vasodilators is suggested . If rapid improvement in oxygenation is not seen, treatment should be reduced (weak recommendation, very low quality evidence).
The use of pulmonary recruitment maneuvers (aimed at opening closed lung segments, such as pressures of 40 cm H2O with a 40-second inspiratory pause) is suggested over not using them (weak recommendation, low level of evidence), but not Recruitment maneuvers with stepwise increases in PEEP are recommended (strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence).
e suggests the use of venovenous circulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or referral to an ECMO center, if available, for selected patients (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence).
Therapy
In mechanically ventilated adults who do not have ARDS , routine use of systemic corticosteroids is not suggested (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). In those with ARDS, the use of corticosteroids is suggested (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence).
In mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients who have respiratory failure, the use of empiric antimicrobial/antibacterial agents is suggested (no evidence grading); evaluate de-escalation therapy.
In critically ill adults with fever , the use of pharmacological agents for temperature control is suggested over non-pharmacological agents or no treatment.
Routine use of standard IV immunoglobulins is not suggested.
Convalescent plasma is not suggested .
There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation on the use of any of the following: antiviral agents, recombinant interferons, chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine or tocilizumab.
Guide Features
Experts were recruited to write guidelines on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill adults. These guidelines were written by 36 experts from 12 countries.
The recommendations were developed based on limited direct evidence with COVID-19 cases and indirect evidence derived from previous pandemics such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and other coronavirus infections.
Evidence base
The GRADE method was used, with the questions from the practical guide in population, intervention, comparator, results (PICO) format. A recent clinical trial of 2,862 healthcare personnel at 137 outpatient sites compared the use of N95 respirators versus medical masks and found no significant differences in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza. The CDC recently discussed strategies to optimize the supply of face masks.
Critically ill patients with COVID-19 often develop septic (distributive) shock. Fluid resuscitation guided by dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness is recommended based on a reduction in mortality in a meta-analysis of 1652 patients in 13 trials. These dynamic measures facilitate a more judicious, rather than liberal, fluid strategy both during and after the initial resuscitation.
Benefits and harms
The panel issued a suggestion against the routine use of systemic corticosteroids for respiratory failure without ARDS in COVID-19, but issued a suggestion for their use in patients with ARDS . A retrospective, non-peer-reviewed report of 46 patients 6 suggested treatment with methylprednisolone , 1 to 2 mg/kg/day for 5 to 7 days, was associated with a reduction in the duration of fever and the need for supplemental oxygen.
The panel also drew on indirect evidence of corticosteroid use in community-acquired pneumonia, ARDS and other viral infections, using a Cochrane review on steroid use in viral pneumonia, updated to include 15 cohort studies on influenza and 10 about coronavirus. This analysis found an association between corticosteroid use and increased mortality , although the association among coronavirus patients was unclear.
The recommendation for the use of oxygen therapy with HFNC is based on the findings of a clinical trial that showed a benefit relative to standard oxygen and NIPPV in progression to intubation. The panel also recommended a trial of NIPPV if HFNC is not available or effective.
Following these recommendations can avoid intubation and the need for respiratory assistance , a scarce resource when there are large numbers of COVID-19 cases. However, HFNC and NIPPV can also aerosolize respiratory droplets, which will increase the need for negative pressure rooms and N95 or FFP2 masks, which are also a scarce resource.
Discussion
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented unprecedented challenges regarding the ability to generate timely evidence, even as the disease overwhelms healthcare systems and strains the clinical workforce. This second SSC guideline will be updated frequently online as global evidence accumulates.
Many of these recommendations are extrapolated from studies and experiences in critically ill patients without COVID-19. However, this pandemic has required flexibility and ingenuity to address its unique challenges, and will require continued and judicious synthesis of heterogeneous and rapidly evolving data and shared clinical experience by clinicians.
Finally, there is a pressing need to address resource allocation , new staffing, and alternative distribution models to ethically provide care to critically ill patients when there are insufficient ICU beds during a pandemic.